Originally I wanted it to be a picture of two pachycephalosaurs "flank-butting" rather that head-butting (which was proven to be practically impossible for them), but then I came to thinking that we don't really know what they were for at all, and many people are now starting to show pachys "flank-butting" so, going against the flow, I just decided to have one kicking the other. Unfortunately I was never able to give it the "motion" I wanted it to have, so I feel it is rather inadequate. But on the other hand, I don't think it looks awful, so here it is.
I also tried to make the background blurry and give a misty, 'primaeval' look to it that is common in older plaeolife art, but rarely seen nowadays, but I don't really think that worked either.
Pencil, colored digitally. Background done in Corel Painter 9, foreground in Photoshop CS2
EDIT: I played around with the layers to make it look more misty and make the atmosphere more aethereal. I hope it worked. I also worked on the tree on the left, giving it more detail and making the picture look more complete. I also fixed the right foot of the pachy on the left so it would not look twisted and worked a bit on the leaf litter too.
Very nice drawing Mike, I like the muted colours . I think if you added a couple of semi-transparent layers you would get a bit of that misty feel you're after.
By the way, I read something by McNeil Alexander (I don't remember the ref) which argued that head to head butting would not have been dangerous, and was well within the the limits of bone and muscle strength for the head and neck - even (or perhaps especially) for the glancing blows that had Bakker worried. Since he'd done the maths and Bakker hadn't, I'd go with him, unless there's more recent research I don't know about.
Very nice drawing Mike, I like the muted colours . I think if you added a couple of semi-transparent layers you would get a bit of that misty feel you're after.
By the way, I read something by McNeil Alexander (I don't remember the ref) which argued that head to head butting would not have been dangerous, and was well within the the limits of bone and muscle strength for the head and neck - even (or perhaps especially) for the glancing blows that had Bakker worried. Since he'd done the maths and Bakker hadn't, I'd go with him, unless there's more recent research I don't know about.
Thanks! I just made some changes to make it appear more misty, among other things. Hopefully it is an improvement.
There's a paper by Ken Carpenter ([link]) saying that due to a small surface area, among other things it would have been almost impossible for "round-domed" pachycephalosaurs to hit each other, unless they faced each other perfectly straight-on, which is very unlikely. Head butting is possible for flat-headed pachycephalosaurs like Homalocephale hovever, according to Carpenter.
--
Certified member of the scientific elite Armchair Palaeontologist specializing in pterosaurs Palaeontographer Idiotbuster Obscure/pointless information provider Know-it-all Genius
I havnt actually done much research (as in, absolutly none) But I did attend a seminar at UW La Crosse to see John Horner and he went over debunking the head butting.
In that time I did come up with the idea of rather than full on 'head butting' how lucrative is an idea is it they may have utilized a shoving match more like modern antlerd animals (white-tail deer, elk, etc.). Stygimoloch make especially good for this theory with their elongated horns that if lowered enough could interlock.
Again, all theory but what can I say im a traditionalist (to a certain extent, I still support the FDS ), and will come up with shit to keep certain elements in the fight. I mean hell, I challanged Horner on his scavenger theory during the question time, so I dont have a good record of picking wise battles.
New deals posted everyday, starting Black Friday and running through the holiday season! No hassles, no lines - just awesome savings on art, deviantWEAR, Premium Memberships and more!
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it.
Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it. Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article.
In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
^Ikue has been a devious member of our community for almost 7 years and in this time he has proven to be nothing short of dedicated and devoted. Whilst volunteering his time over the last 22 months as a Gallery Moderator within the Community Relations Team, Chris has brought the Vector gallery and many vector artists directly into the spotlight. ^Ikue's commitment to the community is evident in everything he touches and you can always find him reaching out to others with an encouraging word. Chris is a natural leader with a vibrant and empathic personality, and is a role model for deviants everywhere. It's ev... Read More
Comments
By the way, I read something by McNeil Alexander (I don't remember the ref) which argued that head to head butting would not have been dangerous, and was well within the the limits of bone and muscle strength for the head and neck - even (or perhaps especially) for the glancing blows that had Bakker worried. Since he'd done the maths and Bakker hadn't, I'd go with him, unless there's more recent research I don't know about.
By the way, I read something by McNeil Alexander (I don't remember the ref) which argued that head to head butting would not have been dangerous, and was well within the the limits of bone and muscle strength for the head and neck - even (or perhaps especially) for the glancing blows that had Bakker worried. Since he'd done the maths and Bakker hadn't, I'd go with him, unless there's more recent research I don't know about.
There's a paper by Ken Carpenter ([link]) saying that due to a small surface area, among other things it would have been almost impossible for "round-domed" pachycephalosaurs to hit each other, unless they faced each other perfectly straight-on, which is very unlikely. Head butting is possible for flat-headed pachycephalosaurs like Homalocephale hovever, according to Carpenter.
--
Certified member of the scientific elite
Armchair Palaeontologist specializing in pterosaurs
Palaeontographer
Idiotbuster
Obscure/pointless information provider
Know-it-all
Genius
In that time I did come up with the idea of rather than full on 'head butting' how lucrative is an idea is it they may have utilized a shoving match more like modern antlerd animals (white-tail deer, elk, etc.). Stygimoloch make especially good for this theory with their elongated horns that if lowered enough could interlock.
Again, all theory but what can I say im a traditionalist (to a certain extent, I still support the FDS
--
Peace, Love, & Death Metal. - Silent Bam
Great deviations!
--
... So Says JoH.
Previous Page123Next Page