Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
October 30, 2009
Image Size
101 KB
Resolution
2000×1275
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
4,086 (2 today)
Favourites
48 (who?)
Comments
9
Downloads
418

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×
Pterorhynchus wellnhoferi by Archosaurian Pterorhynchus wellnhoferi by Archosaurian
Before there was Darwinopterus there was the sadly ignored yet completely amazing Pterorhynchus.
Add a Comment:
 
:icontehya-ninawi:
Tehya-Ninawi Featured By Owner Aug 23, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Fascinating as always!!
Reply
:iconbensen-daniel:
bensen-daniel Featured By Owner Dec 6, 2009
What evidence is there for the tail flanges, and how wide-spread are they in pterosaurs?
Reply
:iconarchosaurian:
Archosaurian Featured By Owner Dec 7, 2009
There are some photos of the type specimen having undergone preparation, the tail vanes run all along the tail. Only Pterorhynchus<i/>, Rhamphorhynchus, and Sordes have been preserved so as to show tail vane remains. In Sordes the vane seems to be a long, thin segmented paddle shape.
Reply
:iconbensen-daniel:
bensen-daniel Featured By Owner Dec 21, 2009
So really, we have no idea what structure most pterosaurs had on their tails. The leaf-shaped vane ala Rhamphorhynchus might be unique to that genus?
Reply
:iconarchosaurian:
Archosaurian Featured By Owner Jan 1, 2010
Exactly!
Reply
:iconkirillus:
Kirillus Featured By Owner Nov 1, 2009
Awesome work as usual!
Reply
:iconahrkeath:
Ahrkeath Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2009
How strange-looking with the serrated tail flanges...pretty cool, nevertheless!
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2009  Student Writer
Wasn't it found that it had a nasoanteorbital frenetra, instead of the two openings seperated?
Reply
:iconarchosaurian:
Archosaurian Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2009
I think there was only ever one reconstruction of it with a full nasoantorbital fenestra, and I'm pretty sure it was the result of a misinterpretation due to the dorsoventral crushing of the right side of the skull displacing a lachrymal. The naris is still quite visible in the photos and the x-rays.
Reply
Add a Comment: