Is this the holotype?

Nice! Any particular reason you've added a crest?

I appreciate the non-Paulian format you're using. Much more useful and *ahem* accurate. The 1/2-n-1/2 ventrodorsal aspect is really nice for reference.
Useful and accurate. A good addition to a reference library. Two thumbs and two big toes way up! (Does that sound weird?)

--
"... to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me." ~Issac Newton

A recently described specimen has soft tissue impressions of a crest.

--
Certified member of the scientific elite
Armchair Palaeontologist specializing in pterosaurs
Palaeontographer
Idiotbuster
Obscure/pointless information provider
Know-it-all
Genius

The holotype is the primary reference, as always. Some bits that are not well resolved in that specimen are based off other similar specimens.

--
Certified member of the scientific elite
Armchair Palaeontologist specializing in pterosaurs
Palaeontographer
Idiotbuster
Obscure/pointless information provider
Know-it-all
Genius

Ah, I missed that one... Could you point me to the reference? Thanks.

It was described in Frey, E., Tischlinger, H., Buchy, M.-C., and Martill, D. M., 2003, New specimens of pterosauria (Reptilia) with soft parts with implications for pterosaurian anatomy and locomotion: In: Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs, edited by Buffetaut, E., and Mazin, J.-M., Geological Society Special Publication, n. 217, p. 233-266. A photo can be found here: [link] but some important details can only be seen under ultra violet light.

--
Certified member of the scientific elite
Armchair Palaeontologist specializing in pterosaurs
Palaeontographer
Idiotbuster
Obscure/pointless information provider
Know-it-all
Genius

Oh alright.

Thanks. I'll see if I can get the paper...